I thought I would comment about possible inaccuracy in this post.
The submarine's ballast tanks keep the submarine at an even depth below the surface. The submarine will not change depth unless the ballast is altered.
John Akwei Any type of feedbakc from you is appreciated because your opinions, whatever they maybe, matter.
As a matter of fact, your opinion about the Aviation related issues and Flat Earth, which were in NASA's document, caused me to research further and , as a result, I found a thorough evidence based evaluation of the same document from a knowldgeable Flat Earther. My knowledge is too limited in Aviation matters, but, despite this limitation some of my observations were consistent with his. His observations, however, had basis in Aviation facts whereas my observations had basis in common sense..
The link below will lead you to the noted self explanatory material. You feedback is appreciated. I hope you find this as challenging as I do. If you find it a bit too much to bother with, don't feel bad about not going further. I think this is a very important subject matter for the entire world and humanity, as we know it.
Also, gyroscopes don't cause planes to fly to higher altitudes, over a round Earth, because more engine power is required for decreased lift from wings at higher altitudes.
Hi Eleni,
ReplyDeleteI thought I would comment about possible inaccuracy in this post.
The submarine's ballast tanks keep the submarine at an even depth below the surface. The submarine will not change depth unless the ballast is altered.
John Akwei Any type of feedbakc from you is appreciated because your opinions, whatever they maybe, matter.
ReplyDeleteAs a matter of fact, your opinion about the Aviation related issues and Flat Earth, which were in NASA's document, caused me to research further and , as a result, I found a thorough evidence based evaluation of the same document from a knowldgeable Flat Earther. My knowledge is too limited in Aviation matters, but, despite this limitation some of my observations were consistent with his. His observations, however, had basis in Aviation facts whereas my observations had basis in common sense..
The link below will lead you to the noted self explanatory material. You feedback is appreciated. I hope you find this as challenging as I do. If you find it a bit too much to bother with, don't feel bad about not going further. I think this is a very important subject matter for the entire world and humanity, as we know it.
https://plus.google.com/+GovernmentGangStalkingandElectronicHarassment/posts/LanQCknkr65
Regards
Eleni
Thanks, Eleni.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the document above, I guess there is a disagreement about whether the air flight computer models of the late 1980's, (see http://ilarge.lisimg.com/image/495743/740full-microsoft-flight-simulator-4.0-screenshot.jpg), were supposed to be realistic, or basic equations (linear vs non-linear), that could be improved later.
Also, gyroscopes don't cause planes to fly to higher altitudes, over a round Earth, because more engine power is required for decreased lift from wings at higher altitudes.