BELOW SEE MY COMMENT EXCHANGE WITH THIS GOVERNMENT TROLL/SHILL AND JUDGE FOR YOURSELF
Government GangStalking and Electronic Harassment47 minutes ago (edited)
Hello wise guy and NASA government troll
Can you answer me this question, with multiple references?
Why is it that earth rotation and the variation of the
gravity vector with position over the earth are systemically ignored in developing an aircraft equations of motion?
You just claimed that Gravity is being considered and used in these equations and this, buddy, is not a fact anywhere no matter how many times you repeat it..
Just point to the gravity in those equations in a specific / detailed manner and without brushing over them as if you know what you are talking about. I want you to show me the gravity in each equation of all the many equations you pointed at in your silly misleading video. Pretend that you are a math expert and that you are teaching us, the silly stupid Flat Earthers, to recognize the gravity factor and to understand its application into these fancy equations that you took the time to point to.
If you do not then you would be admitting guilt to my claims against you.
I also want the concept of gravity to be pointed out in the NASA document whose references for a "NON ROTATING FLAT EARTH" you tried to discredit in order to help NASA's deceptive and corrupt cover up actions. With regard to what is important to pilots and what is irrelevant, you must submit references for those silly claims of yours too. .
Oh... and Do bother to explain why the earth's presumed rotation and its presumed globe shape are not part of any of these equations that you pointed to. ONCE AGAIN, Your explanations MUST BE SPECIFIC, DETAILED AND REFERENCED.
I AM YOUR WORSE NIGHTMARE WITH MATH and I AM SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT CHERRY PICK AT ALL
In addition to the above, I add this FAA document too. Find it here
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/avn/flightinspection/onlineinformation/pdf/TM_08-12_AVN_ANP_Final_Report.pdf
In same specific, detailed and referenced manner, you are asked to provide explanations and answers to the following remarks I made when I posted it. YOUR EXPLANATIONS MUST ALSO INCLUDE LINKS TO THE CLAIMS YOU ATTACKED AND DISCREDITED IN THE OTHER DOCUMENTS
IN PAGE 31, THIS DOCUMENT STATES:
There are four primary methods of estimating
position (latitude / longitude) using geometric
measures relative to a known location:
– Range / bearing from a single known location
– Range / range from two known locations
– Multi-ranges from three or more known locations
– Bearing / bearing from two known locations
• Examples in use today are:
– VOR/DME or TACAN
– DME/DME, multi-DME or multi-satellite (GPS)
– VOR/VOR (only in some military systems)
THEN IN THE FOLLOWING PAGES, IT PROCEEDS IN STATING,
PAGES 32 Range / Bearing Method / Diagram illustrates simplified method (flat earth))
PAGE 33 Range / Range Method / Diagram illustrates simplified method (flat earth))
PAGE 36 Bearing / Bearing Method / Diagram illustrates simplified method (flat earth))
NO REFERENCES WERE FOUND FOR GLOBE EARTH OR FOR ROTATING EARTH
IN OTHER WORDS, FROM THE FOUR PRIMARY METHODS OF ESTIMATING POSITION, (latitude / longitude) , USING GEOMETRIC MEASURES RELATIVE TO KNOWN LOCATION, THE FLAT EARTH MODEL WAS PART OF THEIR EQUATION IN ALL THREE METHODS WHICH, ODDLY, NEVER TOOK IN CONSIDERATION THE GLOBE EARTH MODEL,...NOT EVEN THE EARTH'S PRESUMED ROTATION.
THE LAST METHOD DID NOT CONSIDER THE GLOBE EARTH MODEL AND THE EARTH'S PRESUMED ROTATION EITHER
I suspect that this may go over your arrogant corrupt head so please give this to an Engineer to answer. The operative words here are: PROVIDE MANY REFERENCES FOR EVERY CLAIM, POINT AND STATEMENT MADE IN RESPONSE TO MY QUESTION
As you can see, wise guy, the claims that you made with regard to factors that are not important, are shown here to be very important. As you also see, it is only the Flat Earth Models' attributes that are included in the mathematical equations where all the important factors that you deemed unimportant are calculated. YOU MUST ALSO NOTICE THE COMPLETE ABSENCE OF YOUR BELOVED ROTATING GLOBE EARTH THROUGHOUT THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT. IF YOU DON'T THEN YOU MUST BE A DIFFERENT KIND OF STUPID.
You are not off the hook yet because I am adding this FAA document which, much like the above two, only mentions the Flat Earth model and never the rotating Globe Earth model. Find it here
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf
I am going to paste the comments I included when I posted it.
This document makes several Flat Earth references as follows:
On page xxiv it states:
"X location of the aircraft in flat Earth coordinates "
On page xxvi it states:
"Z-axis of the flat Earth inertial reference frame"
On page xxv it states:
"Y-axis in the flat Earth inertial reference frame"
"Y location of the aircraft in flat Earth coordinates "
"X-axis in the flat Earth inertial frame"
On page 32, It states
"The observant reader will notice that the aircraft equations of motion were calculated assuming a flat Earth and that we here assume the development frame was the NorthEast-Down frame.
This implies necessarily that earth rotation and the variation of the
gravity vector with position over the earth were ignored in developing the aircraft equations of motion. This simplification limits our mathematical model to the flight of aircraft only. The model will not properly handle the flight of sub-orbital craft and spacecraft such as intercontinental ballistic missiles, satellites, or the space shuttle. The
model is adequate for all vehicles traveling under Mach 3. "
HERE YOU NOTICE THE STATEMENT THAT THE CONCEPTS OF EARTH ROTATION AND GRAVITY VECTOR VARIATIONS WITH POSITION OVER THE EARTH ARE IGNORED IN DEVELOPING THE AIRCRAFT EQUATIONS FOR MOTIONS.
SEE THE STATEMENT " that earth rotation and the variation of the
gravity vector with position over the earth were ignored in developing the aircraft equations of motion'
So in other words, for all intents and purposes, unless you are traveling at above Mach 3, or intend to travel into low Earth orbit or higher, then you should just consider the earth to be flat.
But if the Earth was truly curved then this would not work.
For example if you were flying from Sydney, on the east coast of Australia to Perth in Western Australia you would have to travel a distance of 2034 miles.
The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles. That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be!
This fact alone proves the EARTH IS FLAT!
There are no references to a Global Rotating Earth anywhere in this document. My search only yielded the following 2 results which have nothing to do with the presumed global shape of the earth :
Global Positioning System
and its reference source
Parkinson, B.W., Spilker, J.J. (1996). Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
SIMILARLY REPETITIVE STATEMENTS FOR "AIRCRAFT ROTATION SPEED" WERE YIELDED FROM MY SEARCH USING THE TERMS "ROTATE - ROTATION" AND NONE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE EARTH'S ROTATION.
i WILL BE WAITING FOR YOUR RESPONSES WISE GUY ....AS REQUESTED AND AS WARRANTED
Eleni
A proud Greek Flat Earther, a bullshit detector and a corrupt person's worse nightmare
=============================================
THIS WAS HIS RESPONSE WHICH CAME TO ME IN A SPLIT SECOND AFTER I CLICKED THE BUTTON TO PUBLISH MY COMMENT AND TO SEND IT TO HIM. ...DUHHH...!!!!
Sly Sparkane27 minutes ago
+Government GangStalking and Electronic Harassment
well... first of all I owe you nothing... so you're going to take my answer and like it...
I'll give you a hint.. Page 5 of the document (pg 10 in the PDF itself) under Subscript look for what the little "g" stands for.. Then scroll back a page to find under Vectors what the little "g" stands for...
Now I'll just scroll down and pick a page... Let's say page 46 (PDF 51) Gravity is referenced 6 times on that page alone.... (hint... it's the times you see a little g in the formulas) as well as over 20 other pages..
And if you knew what you were reading, you would not have posed the question..
so take your long-winded ignorance somewhere else..
"I AM YOUR WORSE NIGHTMARE WITH MATH"... um... yeah... ok...
===============================================
HE DECIDED , YOU SEE, THAT THE SMALL
THIS WAS MY RESPONSE TO HIM
Government GangStalking and Electronic Harassment3 minutes ago
+Sly Sparkane Thank you very much for answering in a split second, as if you knew the content of my very lengthy comment.
THIS DOES PROVE THAT YOU ARE INDEED A GOVERNMENT SHILL AND A NASA TROLL BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT IS MONITORING MY SITE AND COMMENT ACTIVITY IN REAL TIME. I GUESS YOU GOT CAUGHT BECAUSE YOU RESPONDED AS SOON AS I FINISHED CLICKING TO SEND IT TO YOU.
YOUR HALF ASS RESPONSE, WHICH DID NOT ANSWER ANY OF THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU WERE REQUIRED TO ANSWER, ALSO SERVES AS PROOF THAT YOU ARE NOTHING BUT AN IGNORANT GOVERNMENT TROLL DOING THE GOVERNMENT BUSINESS OF SPREADING THE FAKE ROTATING GLOBE EARTH MODEL AND OF TRYING TO COVER UP AND TO DISCREDIT ANY EVIDENCE THAT EXPOSE THE GOVERNMENT LIES.
THE CONTENT OF YOUR COMMENT ALSO PROVES THAT YOU ARE NOT EDUCATED ON THE LEVEL THAT YOU HAVE PROJECTED ON YOUR VIDEO AND THAT YOU MADE THINGS UP IN ORDER TO COVER UP THE ABOVE NOTED GOVERNMENT LIES. IT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF LOUD AND CLEAR.
THE PAGES YOU REFERENCED HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ANSWERS THAT YOU ARE OBLIGATED TO PROVIDE. THEY DON'T SUPPORT ANY OF THE CLAIMS YOU MADE EITHER ..YOU IGNORANT FOOL.
YOU AND THIS EVIL CORRUPT GOVERNMENT WILL NEVER SUCCEED IN DISCREDITING AND IN COVERING UP THE FLAT EARTH MODEL, HENCE, YOU WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SUCCEED IN HIDING GOD AND IN ACCOMPLISHING YOUR LUCIFERIAN GLOBALIZATION AGENDA
I WILL PUBLISH THIS ENTIRE COMMENT EXCHANGE
Eleni
A proud Greek Flat Earther, a bullshit detector and a corrupt person's worse nightmare
======================================
THIS WAS HIS ANSWER
Sly Sparkane2:54 PM
1
Reply
+Government GangStalking and Electronic Harassment no problem... it's not hard to answer stupid questions...
You might want to put your engineering skills to work... I think your Caps button is stuck...
and go ahead.. publish the comments.. it's your rep... not mine.
======================================
THIS WAS MY ANSWER
+Sly Sparkane Anyone who views the comment exchange will agree that you are a government NASA trolling shill with mental problems to match. YOUR IMPAIRED JUDGMENT SHOWS PLENTY.
My reputation is doing just fine,...it is your REPUTATION that suffers and will suffer even more now
SO LONG TROLL
THIS CONVERSATION HAS ENDED
====================================
EVEN THOUGH I BLOCKED HIM, HE FOUND A WAY TO SEND ME ANOTHER COMMENT WHOSE CONTENT ALSO PROVES THAT HE IS AN IGNORANT GOVERNMENT TROLLING SHILL
HE DENIES RESPONDING WITHOUT REALIZING THAT THE PUBLICATION OF THE ENTIRE COMMENT EXCHANGE BETWEEN US PROVED ALL OF MY ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM, ESPECIALLY THE FACT THAT HE DUCKED AND REFUSED TO ANSWER AS REQUESTED AND AS WARRANTED. TYPICAL TROLLING SHILL OF THE GOVERNMENT TYPE
Sly Sparkane3:15 PM
1
Reply
+Government GangStalking and Electronic Harassment
OMG that's funny.......
"He ducked, insulted without basis and refused to respond"
Insulted? well.. when your opening sentence in your opening post says "Hello wise guy and NASA government troll"... um... turn-about is fair play..
Ducked? Thats funny... you added about 40 lines of text AFTER I submitted my answer to you... I didn't duck anything... you moved the target... (which is why it says "edited"
Refused to respond? um... no...
I didn't delete your comment... but I am about to as it seems that you are just here to shit all over my channel with mindless crap...
=====================================
He ducked, insulted without basis and refused to respond like the government / NASA trolling shill that he is
I DOWNLOADED THIS VIDEO, IN CASE HE REMOVES IT
FOR ADDED INFO ON HIS CLAIMS AND CONDUCT, SEE THE LINKS BELOW
https://plus.google.com/+GovernmentGangStalkingandElectronicHarassment/posts/BYFWyStsjRJ
https://plus.google.com/+GovernmentGangStalkingandElectronicHarassment/posts/LanQCknkr65
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqagsCOYV-w
No comments:
Post a Comment